What I Drank Last Night
Good Booze. Good Food. Good Company.


La Motte Hanneli R 2005 vs. 2007

Polar opposites.

How nuanced does a wine rating system have to be? Two vintages of Hanneli R, the flagship wine from La Motte in Franschoek, side by side over the weekend and I ended up scoring them the same although preferring the 2007 over the 2005…

Hanneli R 2005: 17/20
55% Shiraz, 29% Grenache, 8% Cinsaut and 8% Cabernet Sauvignon. Red and black berries, spice as well as some savoury attributes (raw meat and nuttiness). Lots of concentrated fruit but oak also much in evidence. Rich and full with smooth tannins. Not entirely exaggerated but more daunting than joyous to drink.

Hanneli R 2007: 17/20
81% Shiraz, 10% Grenache and 9% Mourvèdre. Very expressive on the nose: red berries, floral perfume, fynbos and a hint of vanilla. Medium bodied and well delineated – pure fruit, fresh acidity and firm yet fine tannins. Rhône-like in broad terms. Engaging but a tiny bit short of the complexity of other local wines in a similar vein.

The 2005 was the maiden vintage of Hanneli R and the 2007 the second to be released, still available from the tasting room at R806 a bottle. Fascinating to watch as La Motte CEO Hein Koegelenberg and cellarmaster Edmund Terblanche deliberate as to which style best justifies the price tag.

Comments

  1. Christian says:

    R36 000 a bottle for Petrus 2009? The point has been made often enough that after a certain point has nothing to do with covering production costs and everything to do with what the market will bear. South Africa suffers from a “country discount” and Hanneli R is one of those modern-era wines which attempts to overcome this. Time alone will tell if La Motte succeeds.

  2. at R800 a bottle I don’t think I’d be buying any soon. Is the wine really that good compared to something like the Waterford Gem or even some very nice french bordeaux wines from Carolines

Speak Your Mind

*

Current day month ye@r *